|
|
|
houseofx
Стаж: 7 лет 2 месяца Сообщений: 10
|
houseofx ·
28-Дек-24 07:23
(9 месяцев назад, ред. 28-Дек-24 07:23)
Request: C@rrier B@ttles 4 Gu@d@lc@n@l - P@cific W@r N@va@ W@rf@re with DLCx5
|
|
|
|
t3mp11
Стаж: 13 лет 11 месяцев Сообщений: 25
|
t3mp11 ·
28-Дек-24 13:57
(спустя 6 часов)
houseofx писал(а):
87178491Request: C@rrier B@ttles 4 Gu@d@lc@n@l - P@cific W@r N@va@ W@rf@re with DLCx5
|
|
|
|
Berluska74
Стаж: 2 года 7 месяцев Сообщений: 38
|
Berluska74 ·
30-Дек-24 20:59
(спустя 2 дня 7 часов, ред. 30-Дек-24 20:59)
Привет, ребята, я давно здесь не писал, но всегда слежу за этим фантастическим сообществом. Прежде всего, я хотел пожелать всем счастливого 2025 года и пожелать наилучших праздников. Я видел, что последнее обновление VVorld VV@r II €vroqe V1.0.13 вышло в конце ноября от Schvv€rqunktg@m€s. У меня уже была предыдущая версия 1.0.12, думаю, она была доступна некоторое время назад с легендарных Leveller или Vudu, если я правильно помню... прошло больше года. Если бы можно было получить последнее обновление.... большое спасибо.
Hi guys, I haven't written here for a while but I always follow this fantastic community. First of all, I wanted to wish you all a happy 2025 and best wishes for the holidays.
I saw that the latest update of VVorld VV@r II €vroqe V1.0.13 was released at the end of November, from Schvv€rqunktg@m€s. Now, I already had the previous version 1.0.12, I think it was made available some time ago from the legendary Leveller or Vudu if I remember correctly... more than a year has passed. If it were possible to have the latest update.... thank you very much.
|
|
|
|
Leveller
Стаж: 2 года 8 месяцев Сообщений: 154
|
Leveller ·
31-Дек-24 15:13
(спустя 18 часов, ред. 11-Янв-25 17:03)
|
|
|
|
ALEFRANZ
Стаж: 4 года 8 месяцев Сообщений: 110
|
ALEFRANZ ·
31-Дек-24 17:14
(спустя 2 часа, ред. 31-Дек-24 17:14)
@Leveller:
thanks for the updated version of Schwerpunkt ww2
HAPPY NEW YEAR to everyone! 
|
|
|
|
blumentarn
Стаж: 11 лет 9 месяцев Сообщений: 16
|
blumentarn ·
04-Янв-25 16:15
(спустя 3 дня, ред. 04-Янв-25 16:15)
Explain how infantry shoots in the Napoleon series of games JTS?
in those games where the move is divided into phases, everything is clear. and where it's not divided, I don't understand.
can you also tell me where you can download other games in this series for free and without any problems?
|
|
|
|
laska2k4
Стаж: 12 лет 6 месяцев Сообщений: 58
|
laska2k4 ·
04-Янв-25 22:31
(спустя 6 часов)
Hi,
anyone knows how to solve the problem "no valid scenario found" for 5G5 games ?
thanks
|
|
|
|
pww
Стаж: 18 лет 3 месяца Сообщений: 321
|
pww ·
06-Янв-25 14:22
(спустя 1 день 15 часов)
|
|
|
|
ldeza
Стаж: 15 лет 10 месяцев Сообщений: 298
|
ldeza ·
06-Янв-25 19:52
(спустя 5 часов, ред. 06-Янв-25 19:52)
laska2k4 писал(а):
87211987Hi,
anyone knows how to solve the problem "no valid scenario found" for 5G5 games ?
thanks
What SGS game?
blumentarn писал(а):
87210107Explain how infantry shoots in the Napoleon series of games JTS?
in those games where the move is divided into phases, everything is clear. and where it's not divided, I don't understand.
can you also tell me where you can download other games in this series for free and without any problems?
To the second question, page 39.
|
|
|
|
sswiking
Стаж: 13 лет 1 месяц Сообщений: 100
|
sswiking ·
06-Янв-25 21:58
(спустя 2 часа 5 мин.)
pww писал(а):
87219097Всем светлого Рождества!
Merry Christmas. Our Christmas in the UK is over, but I know that your Christmas is today. 
|
|
|
|
laska2k4
Стаж: 12 лет 6 месяцев Сообщений: 58
|
laska2k4 ·
07-Янв-25 16:42
(спустя 18 часов, ред. 07-Янв-25 16:42)
|
|
|
|
crazy1964
Стаж: 15 лет 8 месяцев Сообщений: 182
|
crazy1964 ·
09-Янв-25 13:41
(спустя 1 день 20 часов)
Has somebody all Armored Brigade II?
|
|
|
|
Berluska74
Стаж: 2 года 7 месяцев Сообщений: 38
|
Berluska74 ·
10-Янв-25 02:56
(спустя 13 часов)
Leveller писал(а):
87193541@Berluska74
Привет, Левеллер! Еще раз спасибо за вашу оперативную доступность и за то, что поделились последней версией WWII Europa.... вы, как всегда, были очень любезны.
С наилучшими пожеланиями, что новый год принесет вам все самое лучшее в жизни,
и снова... с небольшой задержкой... наилучшие пожелания всем вам в 2025 году и в связи с только что прошедшим православным праздником Рождества Христова.
|
|
|
|
hamed874
Стаж: 7 лет 10 месяцев Сообщений: 11
|
hamed874 ·
11-Янв-25 13:20
(спустя 1 день 10 часов)
|
|
|
|
Andriyrev
Стаж: 7 лет 10 месяцев Сообщений: 27
|
Andriyrev ·
11-Янв-25 23:25
(спустя 10 часов, ред. 11-Янв-25 23:25)
crazy1964 писал(а):
87232650Has somebody all Armored Brigade II?
It's not released yet.
|
|
|
|
crazy1964
Стаж: 15 лет 8 месяцев Сообщений: 182
|
crazy1964 ·
12-Янв-25 00:39
(спустя 1 час 14 мин.)
Andriyrev писал(а):
87244138
crazy1964 писал(а):
87232650Has somebody all Armored Brigade II?
It's not released yet.
Matrix Games has released Armored Brigade II on 19 November 2024.
And on 12 december 2024 had they all the first update.
|
|
|
|
slackhead
Стаж: 11 лет 9 месяцев Сообщений: 64
|
slackhead ·
12-Янв-25 17:22
(спустя 16 часов)
crazy1964 писал(а):
87244391
Andriyrev писал(а):
87244138
crazy1964 писал(а):
87232650Has somebody all Armored Brigade II?
It's not released yet.
Matrix Games has been released Armored Brigade II on November 19, 2024.And on December 12, 2024 had they all the first update.
Maybe he's thinking of Steam release.
|
|
|
|
compixulo
Стаж: 4 года 3 месяца Сообщений: 80
|
compixulo ·
13-Янв-25 00:53
(спустя 7 часов)
A new PzC has been announced recently; Poland 39. The largest PzC to date.
https://wargameds.com/blogs/news/2024-end-of-year-update
|
|
|
|
Mflopp
Стаж: 15 лет 6 месяцев Сообщений: 424
|
Mflopp ·
13-Янв-25 10:57
(спустя 10 часов, ред. 13-Янв-25 10:57)
The worst thing a game developer can do is get political.
No plans for a new game engine, same tiny icons, same barely visible text, it's 2025 and WDS still has no clue about adjustable UI. Yeah, I'm soooo exited to see the new releases.
|
|
|
|
ldeza
Стаж: 15 лет 10 месяцев Сообщений: 298
|
ldeza ·
13-Янв-25 14:01
(спустя 3 часа, ред. 13-Янв-25 14:01)
Mflopp писал(а):
The worst thing a game developer can do is get political.
That is not a political opinion, it is a historical fact, the Molotov–Ribbentrop Pact.
|
|
|
|
compixulo
Стаж: 4 года 3 месяца Сообщений: 80
|
compixulo ·
13-Янв-25 15:48
(спустя 1 час 46 мин.)
Mflopp писал(а):
87250685
The worst thing a game developer can do is get political.
No plans for a new game engine, same tiny icons, same barely visible text, it's 2025 and WDS still has no clue about adjustable UI. Yeah, I'm soooo exited to see the new releases.
It is not political. The game engine works with 2 parties faced each other. There is no room for a third faction. That way we have in all PzC titles Faction A versus Faction B.
In that case it has sense to include the Soviet Union under the same Faction group as Germany, because both countries are fighting against Poland. On the other hand, historically because Molotov-Ribentrop agreement, germans and soviets dealt to ocuppy the Polish territory under their own influence sphera.
|
|
|
|
Mflopp
Стаж: 15 лет 6 месяцев Сообщений: 424
|
Mflopp ·
13-Янв-25 18:22
(спустя 2 часа 34 мин., ред. 13-Янв-25 18:22)
compixulo писал(а):
It is not political. The game engine works with 2 parties faced each other. There is no room for a third faction. That way we have in all PzC titles Faction A versus Faction B.
In that case it has sense to include the Soviet Union under the same Faction group as Germany, because both countries are fighting against Poland. On the other hand, historically because Molotov-Ribentrop agreement, germans and soviets dealt to ocuppy the Polish territory under their own influence sphera.
Friend, I'm aware of the game mechanics, it's still a choice of the game concept. It's not a fantasy game taking place in an imaginary world, it's based on historical events and there was no Soviet troops fighting on German side, but in this "Poland '39" release they deliberately place Soviet troops on German side thus creating a new reality.
There's always a choice. They could have planned a smaller standalone addition called "Soviet campaign in Poland" for example.
|
|
|
|
YasinAhmet
Стаж: 4 года 11 месяцев Сообщений: 11
|
YasinAhmet ·
13-Янв-25 18:34
(спустя 12 мин.)
Anyone has any Panzer Campaigns title with version 4.04 or 4.05? Or updates for 4.03 => 4.04? I have the 4.00 setups and updates for 4.03, but none for 4.04.
|
|
|
|
leonardusius
Стаж: 15 лет 6 месяцев Сообщений: 29
|
leonardusius ·
13-Янв-25 20:34
(спустя 2 часа)
Mflopp писал(а):
87252261
compixulo писал(а):
It is not political. The game engine works with 2 parties faced each other. There is no room for a third faction. That way we have in all PzC titles Faction A versus Faction B.
In that case it has sense to include the Soviet Union under the same Faction group as Germany, because both countries are fighting against Poland. On the other hand, historically because Molotov-Ribentrop agreement, germans and soviets dealt to ocuppy the Polish territory under their own influence sphera.
Friend, I'm aware of the game mechanics, it's still a choice of the game concept. It's not a fantasy game taking place in an imaginary world, it's based on historical events and there was no Soviet troops fighting on German side, but in this "Poland '39" release they deliberately place Soviet troops on German side thus creating a new reality.
There's always a choice. They could have planned a smaller standalone addition called "Soviet campaign in Poland" for example.
Agreed about that. You're right. It's political but obvious with some degree of 'camouflage'.
|
|
|
|
Ryo09
Стаж: 15 лет 3 месяца Сообщений: 2
|
Ryo09 ·
13-Янв-25 21:46
(спустя 1 час 11 мин.)
ldeza писал(а):
87251379
Mflopp писал(а):
The worst thing a game developer can do is get political.
That is not a political opinion, it is a historical fact, the Molotov–Ribbentrop Pact.
Two can play this game. On whose side was Britain and France, when they refuse Soviet call to defend Czechoslovakia, allowing Hitler to have it instead? On whose side was Poland, when it was threatening war on Soviet Union, in case soviets decide to try and help Czechoslovakia? On whose side was Poland, when it received part of Czechoslovakia? This are historical facts as well. Somehow i don't see developers putting those countries on axis side
|
|
|
|
duqur
Стаж: 4 года 8 месяцев Сообщений: 30
|
duqur ·
13-Янв-25 21:58
(спустя 12 мин.)
YasinAhmet писал(а):
87252347Anyone has any Panzer Campaigns title with version 4.04 or 4.05? Or updates for 4.03 => 4.04? I have the 4.00 setups and updates for 4.03, but none for 4.04.
The problem is that there are updates but without the medicine they do not work
|
|
|
|
ldeza
Стаж: 15 лет 10 месяцев Сообщений: 298
|
ldeza ·
13-Янв-25 22:34
(спустя 35 мин., ред. 13-Янв-25 22:34)
I thought that the game was related with the German (and Slovakian) invasion of Poland from the West and Russian from the East, that started WWII. A direct consequence of the Molotov–Ribbentrop Pact, both were the same side or allies in this war.
But perhaps I am wrong 
Sorry, I do not know those wars in which the UK and France invaded Czechoslovakia with Nazi Germany or Poland invaded the Soviet Union and Czechoslovakia, did they really happen?
SGS Fall Weiss has the same "problem", those are 2 sided games and Nazi Germany and Soviet Russia are on the same side, as it happened.
|
|
|
|
Mflopp
Стаж: 15 лет 6 месяцев Сообщений: 424
|
Mflopp ·
14-Янв-25 13:08
(спустя 14 часов, ред. 14-Янв-25 13:08)
Also I must correct myself regarding the WDS news and plans for 2025 - I said "no plans for a new game engine" which could mean there's somethin' brewing and WDS simply doesn't want to share it yet.
Starting an "entirely new" game series or as they call it " first ever original series" with first planned release under the title "The Crusades: Book I" which " has been in development for several years" means WDS people doesn't even consider any kind of work related to the development of a new game engine.
I bet this " first ever original series" would feel a lot like "Ancient Warfare series" with such titles as "Gallic Wars" (2008), "Punic Wars" (2007), "Alexandrian Wars" (2010) e.t.c., and I hope to see a release announcement where they will nonchalantly use the words "same side", "Syrians", "Palestinians", "Jews" and "Crusaders" in one sentence.
|
|
|
|
compixulo
Стаж: 4 года 3 месяца Сообщений: 80
|
compixulo ·
14-Янв-25 13:23
(спустя 15 мин.)
Mflopp писал(а):
87255302Also I must correct myself regarding the WDS news and plans for 2025 - I said "no plans for a new game engine" which could mean there's somethin' brewing and WDS simply doesn't want to share it yet.
Starting an "entirely new" game series or as they call it " first ever original series" with first planned release under the title "The Crusades: Book I" means WDS people doesn't even consider any kind of work related to the development of a new game engine.
I bet this " first ever original series" would feel a lot like "Ancient Warfare series" with such titles as "Gallic Wars" (2008), "Punic Wars" (2007), "Alexandrian Wars" (2010) e.t.c., and I hope to see a release announcement where they will nonchalantly use the words "same side", "Syrians", "Palestinians", "Jews" and "Crusaders" in one sentence.
As far as I know, the new series, based on pre-'musket and pike' era, is using pretty much the engine of the SB. Many different titles have been discussed or they are being cooked right now but nor of them implies a new engine.
The engines have been barely modified since the original JT development and I have my doubts that it would ever been changed to a new one. For sure it will be patches that improves the graphics, or the AI... but the core of the engine will be the same. For me as a long time player of HPS/JTL/WDS serie it is a bit pitty because many abstract and confuse mechanics could be fixed with a new engine; for example the air warfare, the logistic and even a more reactive AI instead of totally scripted.
To make a new engine is tough and costly work and I think inside WDS team, they are not in hurry to do something like that. They work in a really specific market niche, with a big lack of competitors, and with a huge potential battles or conflicts to cover. So I think they will keep in that confortable position, just developing new titles with the existing engines.
|
|
|
|
Mflopp
Стаж: 15 лет 6 месяцев Сообщений: 424
|
Mflopp ·
14-Янв-25 14:27
(спустя 1 час 4 мин.)
compixulo писал(а):
They work in a really specific market niche, with a big lack of competitors, and with a huge potential battles or conflicts to cover. So I think they will keep in that confortable position, just developing new titles with the existing engines.
Agreed.
Poor mooks buying products from Modern Air Power series and Naval Campaigns when market offers them such titles as "Command: Modern Operations" are like people who pay for phone sex all the while sitting next to a beautiful and willing gal.
|
|
|
|
