|
|
|
duqur
Стаж: 4 года 8 месяцев Сообщений: 30
|
duqur ·
16-Авг-25 20:46
(1 месяц 10 дней назад)
Does anyone have Age of Longbow Volume I, thanks
|
|
|
|
Mflopp
Стаж: 15 лет 6 месяцев Сообщений: 423
|
Mflopp ·
17-Авг-25 07:52
(спустя 11 часов)
duqur писал(а):
88103159Does anyone have Age of Longbow Volume I, thanks
Sent you PM.
Tbh I donno who would wanna play it, after they failed miserably with the Crusades release. The Age of Longbow is the same crap with different unit icons.
|
|
|
|
houseofx
Стаж: 7 лет 2 месяца Сообщений: 10
|
houseofx ·
17-Авг-25 09:42
(спустя 1 час 49 мин., ред. 23-Авг-25 09:50)
|
|
|
|
Mflopp
Стаж: 15 лет 6 месяцев Сообщений: 423
|
Mflopp ·
17-Авг-25 22:13
(спустя 12 часов)
houseofx писал(а):
I would like just to have another from their catalogue. Hoping someone posts.
By all means! Sent you a link in PM.
...and hey, fellas, lookie here!
They actually can deal with situations when there are multiple nations/sides of the conflict involved! All of a sudden, they can put Side A / B and specify who's fighting with whom in the scenario description! They did that quite a long time ago in The Renaissance release in 2009. They " forgot" about this simple solution in Poland'39 propaganda game, and now they remember it again! What can you say, when you turn on a propaganda mode you kinda have to forget what it means to be a professional and a decent human being.
|
|
|
|
compixulo
Стаж: 4 года 3 месяца Сообщений: 80
|
compixulo ·
18-Авг-25 09:28
(спустя 11 часов, ред. 18-Авг-25 22:19)
Mflopp писал(а):
88107234
houseofx писал(а):
I would like just to have another from their catalogue. Hoping someone posts.
By all means! Sent you a link in PM.
...and hey, fellas, lookie here!
They actually can deal with situations when there are multiple nations/sides of the conflict involved! All of a sudden, they can put Side A / B and specify who's fighting with whom in the scenario description! They did that quite a long time ago in The Renaissance release in 2009. They " forgot" about this simple solution in Poland'39 propaganda game, and now they remember it again! What can you say, when you turn on a propaganda mode you kinda have to forget what it means to be a professional and a decent human being.
I do not see at all any kind of propaganda intention in Poland'39. As you quoted, the WDS engine just works with 2 sides. SIDE A versus SIDE B, there is no room for a SIDE C. In Poland 39 main campaign, it is obvious that Poland is one of the side, and Germany is the other side; what is your suggestion as for the USSR?
1-Do we add it in the POLISH side? It is really weird taking in account that the USSR invaded Poland in September 17th, so they would be enemies in that theatre.
2-Do we add it in the German side? Historically Nazi Germany and the USSR never formally allied but, because the Molotov-Ribbentrop pact, we can say that during the events of POLAND'39, both countries were no belligerents between them. So it makes sense it can be allocated in German side, taking in account that THERE IS NO ROOM for a SIDE C in the engine.
3-Do we delete the USSR nation in the conflict?
|
|
|
|
ldeza
Стаж: 15 лет 10 месяцев Сообщений: 298
|
ldeza ·
18-Авг-25 12:09
(спустя 2 часа 41 мин.)
Mflopp, why do you lose so much time with games you hate?
|
|
|
|
dublv
Стаж: 18 лет 8 месяцев Сообщений: 12
|
dublv ·
18-Авг-25 15:58
(спустя 3 часа, ред. 18-Авг-25 15:58)
За ссылочку на длинные луки был бы оооочень благодарен
|
|
|
|
ldeza
Стаж: 15 лет 10 месяцев Сообщений: 298
|
ldeza ·
18-Авг-25 16:01
(спустя 3 мин., ред. 18-Авг-25 16:01)
dublv писал(а):
88109338За ссылочку на длинные луки был бы оооочень благодарен
houseofx писал(а):
I would like just to have another from their catalogue. Hoping someone posts.
It was already posted, just look in the previous page.
|
|
|
|
Mflopp
Стаж: 15 лет 6 месяцев Сообщений: 423
|
Mflopp ·
19-Авг-25 06:11
(спустя 14 часов)
dublv писал(а):
88109338За ссылочку на длинные луки был бы оооочень благодарен
Размещённые непосредственно здесь, в чате, ссылки на Pixeldrain удаляют по жалобе правообладателя практически мгновенно, поэтому отправил вам линк в личном сообщении.
|
|
|
|
Leveller
Стаж: 2 года 8 месяцев Сообщений: 153
|
Leveller ·
26-Авг-25 12:39
(спустя 7 дней)
|
|
|
|
Berluska74
Стаж: 2 года 7 месяцев Сообщений: 38
|
Berluska74 ·
27-Авг-25 18:34
(спустя 1 день 5 часов)
Leveller
Hi Master Leveller, thank you so much for your solid work and keeping that database up to date!!!
Спасибо большое, брат.
|
|
|
|
Leveller
Стаж: 2 года 8 месяцев Сообщений: 153
|
Leveller ·
28-Авг-25 15:03
(спустя 20 часов, ред. 28-Авг-25 15:03)
"Campaing Series: Vietnam | v2.00.01 (Matrix Games Installer)
Notes:
-
- Please don't repack and link elsewhere, but direct people here. We need more people releasing wargames here."
https://cs.rin.ru/forum/viewtopic.php?f=38&p=3347161#p3347161
|
|
|
|
ALEFRANZ
Стаж: 4 года 8 месяцев Сообщений: 110
|
ALEFRANZ ·
29-Авг-25 08:30
(спустя 17 часов)
|
|
|
|
pww
Стаж: 18 лет 2 месяца Сообщений: 321
|
pww ·
29-Авг-25 09:22
(спустя 52 мин.)
|
|
|
|
Scorched54
Стаж: 12 лет 9 месяцев Сообщений: 107
|
Scorched54 ·
29-Авг-25 13:13
(спустя 3 часа)
"Спасибо большое, брат."
Кстати, недавно наткнулся на аббревиатуру времён ВОВ. Оказывается, бро это батальон ранцевых огнемётов.
|
|
|
|
compixulo
Стаж: 4 года 3 месяца Сообщений: 80
|
compixulo ·
30-Авг-25 10:27
(спустя 21 час)
|
|
|
|
Mflopp
Стаж: 15 лет 6 месяцев Сообщений: 423
|
Mflopp ·
31-Авг-25 09:33
(спустя 23 часа)
compixulo писал(а):
THERE IS NO ROOM for a SIDE C in the engine. 3-Do we delete the USSR nation in the conflict?
Hey, friend, it's a kinda bizarre situation, because you're gonna make me talk about self-explanatory things and repeat myself, but at least you're trying to construct an argument, unlike the other one. The problem is, all those arguments become a moot point once you move past the opposing sides naming trick they used.
Let me give you a quote from WDS:
Okay, let's try it one more time with Poland'39:
There are three major nations involved in this conflict ....and we will use the same name for two of those three nations. No further comment.
In terms of the most obvious propaganda bullshit this stunt is pure gold!
You see what makes your points moot? There's no such thing as engine restrictions for the sides involved. You're talking about a non-existing problem. 15 nations in one game. Sides A and B are not tied to nations and vice versa, meaning they are free to put the French on Side A in one scenario, and on Side B in another. That is it, there's nothing to discuss here. In the latest "The Age of Longbow" release, they didn't play stupid and label one side as French and said - oh, hey, engine restriction, we're gonna make a scenario where we have Scots on one side and English on another, and we'll just call Scots French, because - oops! - engine doesn't allow us to do anything about it! The question is - why did they do that cheap "oops! engine!" trick in Poland'39 release? Feel free to disagree, but I'd appreciate it if this discussion ends here, because, as I said, there's nothing to discuss.
|
|
|
|
compixulo
Стаж: 4 года 3 месяца Сообщений: 80
|
compixulo ·
31-Авг-25 13:18
(спустя 3 часа)
Mflopp писал(а):
88155715
compixulo писал(а):
THERE IS NO ROOM for a SIDE C in the engine. 3-Do we delete the USSR nation in the conflict?
Hey, friend, it's a kinda bizarre situation, because you're gonna make me talk about self-explanatory things and repeat myself, but at least you're trying to construct an argument, unlike the other one. The problem is, all those arguments become a moot point once you move past the opposing sides naming trick they used.
Let me give you a quote from WDS:
Okay, let's try it one more time with Poland'39:
There are three major nations involved in this conflict ....and we will use the same name for two of those three nations. No further comment.
In terms of the most obvious propaganda bullshit this stunt is pure gold!
You see what makes your points moot? There's no such thing as engine restrictions for the sides involved. You're talking about a non-existing problem. 15 nations in one game. Sides A and B are not tied to nations and vice versa, meaning they are free to put the French on Side A in one scenario, and on Side B in another. That is it, there's nothing to discuss here. In the latest "The Age of Longbow" release, they didn't play stupid and label one side as French and said - oh, hey, engine restriction, we're gonna make a scenario where we have Scots on one side and English on another, and we'll just call Scots French, because - oops! - engine doesn't allow us to do anything about it! The question is - why did they do that cheap "oops! engine!" trick in Poland'39 release? Feel free to disagree, but I'd appreciate it if this discussion ends here, because, as I said, there's nothing to discuss.
Again, the engine only allows SIDE A versus SIDE B and it does not matter how many nations you have in the game; that nations at the end of the day needs to be allocated in one of the two sides. The Age of Longbow is mostly composed of small/medium scenarios where side A is mostly for frenchies and its allies and side B for britons and their allies. French/Scottish vs UK ; Flemish/French vs UK/Wales ; French vs UK/Gascons....
It has been always that way because the restriction of the engine that, no matter the number of nations, you need to have them allocated in SIDE A or SIDE B. Now, the 'problem' in POLAND'39, that we have not experienced in any other title, is that you have 3 sides:
-SIDE 1: GERMANY and its allies (SK and militias)
-SIDE 2: POLAND
-SIDE 3: USSR
Because the game engine only allows to play with 2 sides you have 2 options:
-OPTION 1: DELETE USSR from the game (something really pitty in my opinion)
-OPTION 2: ADD it inside the SIDE/FACTION that makes more sense. SIDE A (invaders) vs SIDE B (defender). It makes sense that USSR will be allocate in the invaders faction.
It is funny, and no offense at all, but it is like if you go to play chess (white team versus black team) and then you start to complain because there is no room for a third player with red color... Ok fine, but then it is not chess at all and we should invent a new game. Nothing about propaganda, just adapt the history events to the engine of the game. Can we discuss about the engine and why it was not developed to allow more sides? YES we can, but the game right now is like it is.
|
|
|
|
deamon26
Стаж: 16 лет 9 месяцев Сообщений: 38
|
deamon26 ·
31-Авг-25 18:21
(спустя 5 часов)
Does anyone have Rule the Waves 3 ? If someone could share?
|
|
|
|
ldeza
Стаж: 15 лет 10 месяцев Сообщений: 298
|
ldeza ·
31-Авг-25 18:49
(спустя 28 мин.)
deamon26 писал(а):
88157592Does anyone have Rule the Waves 3 ? If someone could share?
Page 49.
|
|
|
|
deamon26
Стаж: 16 лет 9 месяцев Сообщений: 38
|
deamon26 ·
31-Авг-25 23:04
(спустя 4 часа)
Thanx a lot, it really works
|
|
|
|
mastasol
Стаж: 15 лет 8 месяцев Сообщений: 18
|
mastasol ·
01-Сен-25 11:12
(спустя 12 часов)
Hi everyone! Does anybody have Commander: the great war?
|
|
|
|
Zaar12122111
Стаж: 1 год 10 месяцев Сообщений: 9
|
Zaar12122111 ·
01-Сен-25 18:13
(спустя 7 часов, ред. 01-Сен-25 18:13)
Has anybody Gary Grigsby's Eagle Day to Bombing the Reich?
|
|
|
|
ldeza
Стаж: 15 лет 10 месяцев Сообщений: 298
|
ldeza ·
01-Сен-25 19:28
(спустя 1 час 15 мин.)
Zaar12122111 писал(а):
88160935Has anybody Gary Grigsby's Eagle Day to Bombing the Reich?
Page 21.
|
|
|
|
Leveller
Стаж: 2 года 8 месяцев Сообщений: 153
|
Leveller ·
02-Сен-25 13:53
(спустя 18 часов, ред. 02-Сен-25 13:53)
@mastasol
@Zaar12122111
@все
|
|
|
|
Zaar12122111
Стаж: 1 год 10 месяцев Сообщений: 9
|
Zaar12122111 ·
02-Сен-25 16:46
(спустя 2 часа 52 мин.)
Leveller писал(а):
88163296@mastasol
@Zaar12122111
@все
Thank you very much
|
|
|
|
lokvan
Стаж: 4 года 11 месяцев Сообщений: 2
|
lokvan ·
02-Сен-25 21:47
(спустя 5 часов)
|
|
|
|
ldeza
Стаж: 15 лет 10 месяцев Сообщений: 298
|
ldeza ·
04-Сен-25 14:21
(спустя 1 день 16 часов)
SGS KW, updated but not the last.
|
|
|
|
nadia911
Стаж: 15 лет 8 месяцев Сообщений: 41
|
nadia911 ·
07-Сен-25 02:14
(спустя 2 дня 11 часов)
Please M0dern Campalngs last updated
|
|
|
|
ALEFRANZ
Стаж: 4 года 8 месяцев Сообщений: 110
|
ALEFRANZ ·
07-Сен-25 20:32
(спустя 18 часов)
@Leveller:
I have a question about your release of Commander the great war (Matrix): you released installer v1.1.2 and update v.1.6.6,
Matrix website has installer v.1.3.0 and update v.1.6.6.
Does the update v.1.6.6 work on installer v.1.1.2 or we need the update 1.1.2 to 1.3.0?
I think we need the new installer (1.3.0) but I'm not sure.
thanks
|
|
|
|
